Whilst I tend to agree with you I don't think anything said here really warrants that sort of response. It is just shaving mate. Relax.
I should make it clear that it's not aimed at any one person, in case anyone has taken unintended offence, it is a general rant regarding shitty products.
I just can't tolerate under performing products and folks supporting them, to the detriment of other products which almost universally work.
We lose good products with reformulated items and businesses fold for various reasons, when they're the products and businesses that need our support, both for their and our own selfish reasons.
Col Conk, Crabtree & Evelyn, Williams, AOS, Penhaligons, Geo F Trumper, all examples of companies that don't deserve a foothold in the current market, yet do so, at the expense of products from the likes of
@Anthony which the largest qualm I've seen are scent preferences or his constant pursuit to improve his formula and advising customers of as such with the version of his soap.
Mate, let me ask of you this.
How many more adults, do you think would stick with traditional wet shaving, if the likes of those under performing products which are likely their first and only experience didn't exist, and they tried a true artisan or product that almost universally worked?
It's an issue that I've noted when trying to introduce/encourage adults to pursue this and advise them to try several items before quitting, even loaning items from my own collection, so they've a better chance of it working out for them.
@borked IMO their are many wet shavers out there I would say 60% loves MWF who can lather without any bloody issue, and 40% still complain about it and can't get enough lather to work with MWF regardless of soft to very hard water or even the type of shaving brush they've used.
All I'm saying is some have enough bare balls to fully understand how MWF works, and some don't have enough bare balls to even try and understand MWF and they've just give up.
How many times have you're parents, teachers and coaches say keep on trying and it will get better in the end unless you try.
Beside the original MWF formula dated in 1893 is the date for the original Yorkshire formula of wool fat soap, and when Fred Mitchell started producing MWF in the early 1930's because the MWF ingredients were not know in 1893 and the formula never change.
Four in every ten experience issues with MWF, yet that's acceptable for a long established item, where performance is god and price is king?
Not a direct nor fair comparison I realise, yet would you be happy with 4 in 10 attempts at your income being paid to you failing?
Let's look at that as 4/10 shaves fail, or 146 shaves a year if shaving daily.
Is that a reasonable number?
I'm pissed if I have 10% of that number annually, particularly as they tend to happen just before a meet up!
As for trying and failing, I've been trying and failing at something since pre-teens, yet others view the pursuit as success alone, with the results an end game achievement, so I've the testicular fortitude that you mention.
Despite all of this, I would still give both MW and MWF a go, since I've not tried either, yet if they don't work for other, the tolerance for bad performance is already diminished.
BTW, sometimes change is acceptable, alas we would still be eating, drinking and covering ourselves with deadly substances like asbestos and lead!
Maybe it's time MWF considered a modern version of their product, if it actually improves it's performance across a wider range of potential users?